this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
635 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

86745 readers
3531 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/62209262

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Soup@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Except their weight which leads to insane amounts of energy transfer and also none of the intrastructure, like guardrails, is built to handle that much weight so low down.

The way to safer is to reduce the amount of cars.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

The way to safer is to reduce the amount of cars.

Hersey! Blasphemy! Unamerican!

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

First time I ever heard about guardrails having issues with EVs. Do you have a source for that?

Also the comment was about the fire risk, which the article was about.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

It affects more than the guardrail situation as well. Any collision with a car laden with extremely heavy batteries as low to the ground as possible has inertia and force that was not calculated into road safety systems originally.

This can be corrected, but the first step is recognizing and accounting for it. Which seems to upset people for reasons I cant comprehend.

But as the other guy said, the safest systems are the ones with the fewest cars on the road in general.

[–] neo2478@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Next best thing to improving public transport to reduce the ammouny of cars would be reducing the size of cars, thus in large part negating the weight issue.

But like you said, nothing beats just having fewer cars on the road.

[–] Polisheocket@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just make cars insanely expensive, eventually Less cars will be on the riad

[–] neo2478@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That just punishes poor people. If you male public transport good, people will take it.

[–] Polisheocket@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

I was being sarcastic and it didn’t come off well