this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
1022 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

83831 readers
3972 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sodium batteries are cheaper, safer, and last longer than lithium batteries. That's exactly what you want for grid-scale energy storage. So yes, sodium IS better than lithium for grid-scale energy storage

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They are also fine for cars that don't need to have 1000km of range, for some stupid reason.

And you can even mix-and-match cells of both types in a vehicle to better fit a target demographic. It's not simply one or the other.

That being said, it's better to have a car with a 200 mile range sodium battery and a small range extender for that 2-4 times per year trip