this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2026
21 points (70.6% liked)

Technology

83858 readers
3147 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Research.

A new mobile app will soon put the ability to monitor a baby’s prenatal heartbeat in the hands of pregnant women who may worry about their baby’s health in between doctor’s visits.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 68 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

As a hardware and software professional, this headline sounds like 100% bullshit.

allows your phone to measure prenatal heartbeat

That is not the same thing as an ultrasound scanner.

It's a microphone app which trims to, and amplifies, specific frequencies which allows you to monitor the baby's pulse.

You absolutely can use your phone with an ultrasound scanner, but this requires external hardware which, while not restricted, is not super cheap.

[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 hours ago

This is probably going to end up like that feature on some smartphones that replaces your picture of the moon with a preset image of the moon.

I don't see this going well. Also, even if it did, is it a good idea to blast a fetus with Ultrasound over and over and over?

🤷

[–] blueworld@piefed.world 9 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Absolutely bullshit in a headline, but also potential mamas will probably use this often. The value in hearing your baby's heartbeat is probably a huge reassurance to many.

Having said that, as a hardware professional, when could we see a consumer accessible mobile ultrasound? I don't have a spare $2-5k for what they use in ambulances, but I am hoping something low res low quality is accessible in a few years. (Having just read about the open source phased array, I have new hope for many things).

[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Unfortunately it's not a matter of capability, but certification. Your watch probably has more processing and imaging power than the best medical systems available in the late 90s, but if you're planning to market it as anything with even a whiff of medical application, even from the home, then it will need ISO 13485 certification in order to obtain required insurance that costs enough to prevent medical market entry for most businesses, especially when you combine that with the concept of unborn babies.

[–] haerrii@feddit.org 1 points 10 hours ago

I mean, according to the rule of phamaceutics, the equivalent costs fo a non-medical ultrasound would be about 10-fold cheaper. So if you don't care about eventual side effects, you could have an absolute bargain