this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2026
293 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

83893 readers
2577 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Engineers are confident that shutting down the LECP will give Voyager 1 about a year of breathing room. They are using the time to finalize a more ambitious energy-saving fix for both Voyagers they call “the Big Bang,” which is designed to further extend Voyager operations. The idea is to swap out a group of powered devices all at once — hence the nickname — turning some things off and replacing them with lower-power alternatives to keep the spacecraft warm enough to continue gathering science data.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

which would shut down components on its own to safeguard the probe, requiring recovery by the flight team — a lengthy process that carries its own risks.

Uhhh... how the fuck are you planning on recovering it?

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 10 points 1 hour ago

I think what they mean is that if the thing starts shutting stuff down on its own, the process to get those things started again is tedious. While if the humans tell it to shut things down, it is all more orderly.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 4 points 33 minutes ago

Really long stick

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

That bit confused me as well. I'm thinking in case the launch and deployment failed, they could get it back much more easily

[–] mierdabird@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 51 minutes ago

This thing launched 50 years ago, it and it's sister probe are farther from earth than anything else by multiple orders of magnitude, they're literally outside the sun's influence. We obviously aren't getting them back so recovery must mean recovery to an operational state