this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
74 points (97.4% liked)
Memes
50146 readers
1514 users here now
Rules:
- Be civil and nice.
- Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I honestly feel like Smith gets a real bad rap from undereducated progressives. He would also have hated what the United States has morphed into, and I'm sure he's spinning in his grave over people using his economic theories as justifications for pure laissez-faire capitalism. "The Invisible Hand of the Market" that conservatives use to justify trickle-down economics and often attribute to him isn't even really his, it's from a batshit insane later guy called Paul Samuelson! Smith only referred to it in the context of international investments, never this idea that "domestic corporations will always do what is good for the public."
I don't agree with everything in Wealth of Nations, but it seems a lot of people just dismiss Smith completely out of hand. We should talk about him just like we talk about Marx, his work is not useless nor trivial.
Amusingly, people who promote capitalism have clearly never read Smith either. Marx wasn't a departure from Smith, he built directly on the work Smith started. Smith talked about division of labour, and Marx initially used the same term before he started calling it socialized labour. I suspect if most people in the west read Smith today, they'd label him a communist. Consider the following Smith quote as an example:
i've never heard of this guy; do you know where i can find his work?
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3300