this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
342 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

69545 readers
3529 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] astropenguin5@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Unfortunately the limitations there are probably in the brain not the limb. For example, can you competentely do two things at once with each of your hands?

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Fair, but do you have to manipulate them at the same time? Most of the time we use our hands to hold something, or do very simple repetitive movements. This doesn't require much brain power to do, and is still very useful. For example, such arms could hold our bags, while our natural ones can do whatever else.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Any random individual? Maybe not. But one man bands exist and are completely reliant on this concept.

[–] astropenguin5@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Fair, although I was more referring to fully separate tasks, one could argue a one man band is still broadly doing things in sync and broadly the same mental task.

It is a valid point that it could be learned with enough practice and dedication, but I think going above two would be exponentially harder.