this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2026
264 points (96.2% liked)

Linux

64925 readers
292 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Where are people getting that this is a rebrand?

It's just an environment variable you can set that changes the name if it offends you.

[–] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

For now. It seems like obvious water-testing.

And even if it isn't, giving "users" (read: corporate middle managers never actually using the app) the "option" of the "name" "not being" "naughty".

These all "these" are "concepts" GIMP can do without.

The name is what it is. You didn't make the app, you don't set the name. Simple as.

And to the makers/maintainers:

Is throwing old and loyal users under the bus worth it?

The conspiracy theorist in me can see this being the start of the end of GIMP. It wouldn't be the first or the last FOSS project to "fall from grace".

I'm not saying it will - I don't want to do a detailed study of GIMP lore and current politics, but the simple act of potentially enabling a rename in the future is a GIANT FUCKING RED FLAG in my book.

Even with good intentions, it "enables" a "later" "usurpation".

It's like deliberately cutting yourself in the middle of pirrhana-infested pool.

The wound's not deep. It isn't dangerous. Nor do the pirrhanas notice right away.

But when they do... You'll be lucky to just lose the leg you cut.

[–] XPost3000@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

u still use blender right click select

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Also tbh, if it does the same things as before, they could call it POOP, and I'd still use it. The name has no bearing on how it functions.

Who is really out here getting bent out of shape over a name?

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also tbh, if it does the same things as before, they could call it POOP, and I'd still use it. The name has no bearing on how it functions.

That sounds like an argument against the name change…

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago

No, I vote they change it to be just an unpronounceable symbol. You know, kind of like the artist formerly known as Prince.

It's a lot harder to complain about a name change if it's not a name!

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Software needs users to fund development and most users find the software via word of mouth and there's no way I'm telling a friend that they should try POOP for their next art project

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago

How you gonna make the good shit without POOP?

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Do you tell them to try GIMP?

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 4 points 2 days ago

Nope, but it's a nicer way to say, "Y'all are fucking stupid for caring this much about a name change for software that's free."

I'd rather let people read between the lines on their own!

[–] DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Lmao, imagine being so fragile that a name offends you.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As a gimp myself, I agree that being offended is pretty far-fetched. But I can definitely envision a scenario in which someone would rather not be reminded of that word every time they open their image editor. Disability is traumatic and people can be absolutely horrible.

[–] DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] cookiecoookie@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

GTA SA was my only knowledge of what a gimp is

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

it has been used as a slur for disabled people.

[–] DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I've literally never heard that before. Is that common in your experience?

[–] mikerr@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

Yes, also say something is "GIMPed" if it's broken or disabled/restricted in some way.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

well not in modern parlance but yeah I'm aware it's an olde timey word

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

It's more commonly associated with the movie Gimp

[–] RedWeasel@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

I have heard it used that way in the last decade I think

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At this point everything has been used as as slur

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

That's for sure 10-ply. There isn't a word or phrase that can't be used as a slur.