this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
293 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

69658 readers
2747 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 97 points 2 days ago (5 children)

So they’ll lower prices. Right?

[–] toastmeister@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Their margins are being squeezed by AMD, so they already are.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 62 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Something a lot of people don't understand (you obviously do) is that pricing is not based on what something costs. It's based on the absolute maximum a consumer is willing to pay. If they cut costs somehow, they just pocket the difference. If it costs more to make than a consumer will pay they just don't make it.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In theory, it would allow them to reduce costs to compete better with rivals and sell more.

But usually it's the thing you said. Capitalism fundamentals are pretty broken in most markets.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

In theory, it would allow them to reduce costs to compete better with rivals and sell more.

Selling more could mean lower profits over all. If you have to build out extra production capacity (new fixed costs) to create more product that you're receiving a lower price on, then it could have been more profitable to sell fewer units but at a higher cost creating more profit.

Example: If you're at 90% capacity on your $1 billion factory selling your product for high price/high profit, and you lower your price which increase sales by 20%, you now have to another $1 billion factory to product the 8% of product not producible at your first factory. You've now lost nearly $1 billon from your larger sales.

[–] pikmeir@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] einkorn@feddit.org 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

It'll take another massive quality scandal, or just a generation of shit products, but sure

[–] pulido@lemmings.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nah. This just increases profits.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 1 points 1 day ago

But it also lowers yhe quality