this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2026
759 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

84166 readers
2510 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eodur@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I totally agree. I think it stems from Ops people that are angry at developers for building bad software. Theoretically making devs responsible for their deployments would make them care more about the quality, but really it just splits their focus and now they make bad software and provide poor ops.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago

Agreed about salty ops people. That said it is important even for fancy-schamcy Architect-level engineers to be assigned real annoying bugs in the codebase they helped to shape