this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
76 points (75.7% liked)

Asklemmy

54159 readers
437 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lemmy.world reportedly bans people for being anti-Zionist. At the same time, numerous human rights organizations have documented that Zionist policies and actions amount to crimes against humanity (e.g., forced displacement, collective punishment, apartheid).

If banning opposition to crimes against humanity is itself anti-humanity, doesn’t that make lemmy.world complicit? How do you reconcile defending a platform that silences critics while atrocities continue?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MindfulMaverick@piefed.zip 20 points 3 days ago (4 children)

The problem is, Israeli far-right groups and Zionist advocates have spent decades turning "antisemitic" into a shield. You call out forced displacement, apartheid, collective punishment—all well documented by Amnesty, B'Tselem, and Human Rights Watch—and they call you an antisemite. It's an old trick, and it works.

So when a platform like lemmy.world bans "anti-Zionists," they're buying into that same smear. They're not separating bigotry from basic human rights criticism. That means you literally can't speak out against genocide there without being branded an antisemite. The only way to say "stop the genocide" is to wear that label as a badge of honor. And that's exactly the point: any platform that forces you to accept a false accusation just to state the obvious is complicit.

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 days ago

I completely agree. There was an analogy used at work some years ago. If we decided to call a dogs tail a leg, would that mean that all dogs have five legs? The answer is ridiculously simple. Dogs have four legs and a tail. The names used make no difference. In this case, if Israel is committing genocidal acts, then that is just a straight fact. Renaming objection as anti-Semitic does not take away the fact of the genocide.

[–] Pissed@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

That isn't limited to right wing or far right groups. Plenty of liberal Zionists who are still hiding behind the anti semitism claim. I guess admitting that you spent most of your life shilling for apartheid and genocide must be tough.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 6 points 3 days ago

The term is broken and should never be used by anyone outside of their fascist bubble. Arabs are a semitic people too I would add. If they don't give the exact details of the offense, ignore. And if they do give the details, call it what it is, anti israel, anti zionist, anti fascist, or anti jewish. No country represents a race of people.

It's all in bad faith anyway, it's not about the plausibility of the argument, it's about bullying you, and as such they come hard and fast at the first provokation to dissuade others before an organized resistance can form.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Who gives a shit what they call you, they have no credibility