this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
1 points (66.7% liked)

Technology

77096 readers
4456 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
1
Youtube has fully blocked Invidious (github.com)
submitted 1 year ago by captainkangaroo@discuss.tchncs.de to c/technology@lemmy.world
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/22423685

EDIT: For those who are too lazy to click the link, this is what it says

Hello,

Sad news for everyone. YouTube/Google has patched the latest workaround that we had in order to restore the video playback functionality.

Right now we have no other solutions/fixes. You may be able to get Invidious working on residential IP addresses (like at home) but on datacenter IP addresses Invidious won't work anymore.

If you are interested to install Invidious at home, we remind you that we have a guide for that here: https://docs.invidious.io/installation/..

This is not the death of this project. We will still try to find new solutions, but this might take time, months probably.

I have updated the public instance list in order to reflect on the working public instances: https://instances.invidious.io/. Please don't abuse them since the number is really low.

Feel free to discuss this politely on Matrix or IRC.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LunarLoony@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And while we're at it, stop calling them 'content creators'

EDIT: to clarify, my stance on this is that 'content creator' devalues the human endeavour behind a piece of work (or content, if you will). Instead it's just slop for the machine, and who cares what it is as long as it gets numbers, right?

[–] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What is the alternative name for someone who creates content for a platform?

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do we need a general term? Someone who uploads their videos to a video platform is probably a "video producer".

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Content

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Creator

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So what should we say when discussing people who make video, audio, text media?

I see their point about "content", where, on YouTube, for example, it devalues the videos as subordinate to YouTube as a platform, but I think as people use the word "content" it loses that connotation.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

video → video producer

audio → musician, podcaster, … depending on the type of audio

text media → author