this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
540 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

84324 readers
4036 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 3 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Who did she exploit to earn her billions?

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You tell me. But I know it's impossible to become a billionaire without exploiting someone, not paying taxes, and not being greedy as fuck.

Change my mind.

[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 1 points 5 days ago (5 children)

impossible to become a billionaire without exploiting someone, not paying taxes, and not being greedy as fuck.

You're stating your opinion as fact.

There are billionaire artists simply because people want to buy what they're selling. Equating Taylor Swift or James Cameron to Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos is absolute cringe behaviour, devoid of all nuance.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

How are the bodies of all of the people that build her stages doing? How about all of her dancers and backup singers? "But she gave a huge bonus to everyone on her last tour!!" Okay, and what about the dozens of tours before that?

Nobody becomes a billionaire without exploiting someone.

[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Cool. No one should do any work by that metric.

You fucking zealots are even more annoying than Swifties.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

There are plenty of companies run by single (or even double!)-digit millionaires that are enriched by their wealth without effectively stealing the labor of most of their employees 🤷‍♂️ but, by all means, feel free to just give up and keep licking that boot.

Why do you think we need billionaires? What do they accomplish for the good of the country or the people in it that couldn't be accomplished at half or 1/10 or 1/1000th the cost?

How does Bezos putting 99% of his competitors out of business, reducing competition through market capture, help you? How does Zuck or Pichai selling your browsing habits, which you see no proceeds from, improve your life? What do these billions sitting in oligarchs' bank accounts do for you that they wouldn't be able to as public funds, fixing your roads or building new rails?

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 1 points 4 days ago

my thing is that while a lot of people are struggling to even eat or house themselves, cunts like taylor are sitting pretty on their fucking billions.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If jesus made 1500 dollars every day since he was born without paying taxes and spending any money, he would now be a billionaire. But sure, she cracked the code of becoming an ethical billionaire in a few years.

[–] StillAlive@piefed.world -5 points 5 days ago

Zucc's networth is 100x of Swift's.

You fucking zealots are even more annoying than Swifties.

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

There are billionaire artists simply because people want to buy what they're selling.

You're stating your opinion as fact.

You should go and do some math to understand what it actually takes to become a billionaire and what an insane amount of money that is. Then you can try and explain to me how an honest person can achieve that in a lifetime.

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

You can always tell whose frontal lobes haven't fully formed before they post by how incapable of nuance they are.

[–] teft@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Those billions came from underpaid workers that supported the billionaire in their endeavors. Think road crew and tour bus drivers and beverage stand workers.

Someone somewhere was getting screwed in order for her to make billions.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 3 points 5 days ago

Won't someone think of the poor swifties,

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Fans who would pay $1000+ for a ticket, but that's on them anyway for making a poor choice.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Between an exploitative streaming economy and a “cost-of-touring crisis,” buying merch is sometimes the most direct way to get money into an artist’s pocket, even with venue cuts. Just ask Taylor Swift, who, according to Pollstar, made approximately $200 million in merchandise from her 2023 Eras tour dates.

The Environmental Impact of Fast Fashion, Explained

Fast fashion companies focus on low-cost garments that replicate the latest fashion trends, quickly pushing them into stores to capitalize on these trends. This means that retailers are able to offer a greater variety of products in large quantities and allow consumers to get more fashion and product differentiation at a low price.

According to an analysis by Business Insider, fashion production comprises 10% of total global carbon emissions, as much as the emissions generated by the European Union. The industry dries up water resources and pollutes rivers and streams, while 85% of all textiles go to dumps each year. Even washing clothes releases 500,000 tons of microfibers into the ocean each year, the equivalent of 50 billion plastic bottles.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Band T-shirts are sometimes


or even often


the highest quality T-shirts available. Many bands bother to make sure that the stuff they sell is 100% cotton, fair trade, etc. I think I even have some that were made by union labor.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Band T-shirts are sometimes — or even often — the highest quality T-shirts available.

Small local bands tend to source from local manufacturers and distributors. And as they consider their merch a form of advertising, it pays to invest in material that lasts.

But the bigger and more volume-based franchises tend to get their clothes from the same global production and distribution chains as every other Fast Fashion brand. Taylor Swift isn't contracting with a dozen different local print shops per venue to fill an order big enough to saturate a stadium. She's going to the same folks that sell to H&M and Zara.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Yeah I've never cared enough to check and don't own any of her merch but you're probably right in this specific case.