this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
571 points (99.5% liked)

xkcd

16292 readers
243 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

xkcd #3238: Soniferous Aether

Title text:

Imagine you could ride alongside a sound wave. It would probably be pretty cool, right? We're putting in a departmental budget request to buy a really fast plane so we can check it out.

Transcript:

Transcript will show once it’s been added to explainxkcd.com

Source: https://xkcd.com/3238/

explainxkcd for #3238

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cynar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's quantum mechanical, so the maths gets complex. It can be simplified in a useful way however.

Basically, atoms can absorb photons and then re-emit them. You can think of the photon flying past at C, but getting absorbed and emitted along the way, adding delays. In QM however, neat particles don't exist, it deals with quantised, probabilistic waves. The above effect gets blurred over the waveform. No one atom definitely absorbs it or doesn't, it gets blurred together into a general slowing of the wavefront.

[–] probable_possum@leminal.space 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Like toll booths on highways. Understood.

In QM however, neat particles don't exist, it deals with quantised, probabilistic waves. The above effect gets blurred over the waveform. No one atom definitely absorbs it or doesn't, it gets blurred together into a general slowing of the wavefront.

That's exactly the amount of QM I can understand. Which means I don't understand QM. ;)

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

QM isn't insane to understand. It's main issue is that it doesn't map well/at all to our normal experience. You need to dive into the maths, and accept what falls out.

The main deeper level here is how the blurring happens. The photons explore all possible paths. The result is an integral of them all. In general, vast areas cancel out, leaving classical (ish) behaviour. This makes sense mathematically, but has no classical analogy to compare to.