this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
76 points (75.7% liked)

Asklemmy

54159 readers
437 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lemmy.world reportedly bans people for being anti-Zionist. At the same time, numerous human rights organizations have documented that Zionist policies and actions amount to crimes against humanity (e.g., forced displacement, collective punishment, apartheid).

If banning opposition to crimes against humanity is itself anti-humanity, doesn’t that make lemmy.world complicit? How do you reconcile defending a platform that silences critics while atrocities continue?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Which is particularly ironic when they go HURR DURR .ml HURR DURR TANKIE AUTHORITARIAN HURR DURR OPPOSING OPINIONS NOT ALLOWED.

Other than the tankie part what do you do differently?

[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Liberal spaces live and die on free speech theatre. They always have to pretend they're protecting free speech and allowing open debate. Being perceived as "authoritarian" is their kryptonite, because authoritarianism is the one thing they claim to oppose above all else.

Communist spaces will unapologetically hit you with the ban hammer for defending imperialism, fascism, capitalism, bigotry, etc. and I respect that.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago

It's the general problem of defining yourself as being against something and not actually being for anything.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

on .ml the bans tend do also tend to be temp ones, unless someone's seriously harassing. so like people will be complaining about the 1984 censorship regime here but then if you look at their modlog more often than not they got a slap on the wrist for insulting people or doing the laziest anticommunism ever put into text. often both.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago

And the really angry ones tend to be banned for some flavor of bigotry.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago
[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I wonder what happens on .ml when you voice some alternative opinions... πŸ€”

[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago

It's depend of the "alternative opinion". Factually wrong get downvote and length response, different opinion just length response, regurgitate propaganda get comment removed, "I'm right because I'm white" is ban.

[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

This is just the nazi "I was banned just for having a differing opinion!"

Like yeah man, don't support genocide, don't carry water for genocidaires, most people find it very easy, but the ones who find it hard seemingly can't stop whining about it.