this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
62 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

34699 readers
44 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org 3 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Ahh good point. That's frustrating and something I always forget. The numerous updates and adjustments required for games is annoying. There's certainly something to be said about the days when games were thoroughly play tested and then released in a mostly solid state

[–] Quexotic@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago

Or 100% solid-state, if you know what I mean.

Believe it or not there was a time when all games on all consoles shipped 100% complete. No patches necessary.

Now it's about maximizing quarterly earnings and seeing how far you can screw the customer before they leave your product and ecosystem altogether.

Greed-fueled enshitification.

I'm sick of it.

[–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Has this ever been the case? For as long as I've been playing games (early 1990s), there have always been buggy games that were clearly not thoroughly playtested. The difference was that back then, patches were either impossible (console - at best there was a silently patched re-release later*) or required PC players to purchase a gaming magazine to get them (if there were any). Perhaps the fact that it's now easy to distribute even large patches has incentivized developers to adopt a "we'll fix it eventually" approach, but I have no actual data on this resulting in worse games on average. If there is an actual measurable decrease in software quality in the gaming world, it could just be that the increasing technical complexity of games makes it impossible to detect the majority of bugs these days.

*GTA San Andreas is one of the better known examples of this. There were game-breaking bugs in the original PS2 release that made 100% completion impossible. Only later releases (and ports) had these issues fixed.

[–] Quexotic@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago

I think the best way to put it is that a game at release today is more like a game in beta in the 90s.

A game in beta at the 90s would mostly work and would probably be almost thoroughly playable, but the difference is here you don't have a cartridge that you can't update. You have a piece of software that's sitting on a hard drive anyway and is fully updateable after launch. And so they're pushing the production further and further down that line, right? The enshittification comes where they push it further and further towards Alpha so they can cut their losses if the game doesn't turn out to be all that profitable or interesting to the players.

[–] Sina@beehaw.org 2 points 6 days ago

At the very least most games were less buggy on release than Gta5 is now in 2026. There were negative examples of course, but that's the minority.