this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
343 points (98.0% liked)

Asklemmy

54159 readers
428 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The first Jurassic Park movie is all time one of the greatest films ever made with the special effects still holding up to this day. The 2nd film was still very enjoyable in my opinion but it was just a cookie cutter sequel not bad, not good. The 3rd film wasnโ€™t great at all. But compared to the rest of the series the 3rd film is basically the godfather.

As another personal pick the 1st blade movie is a hood classic good. The other 2 not so much.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 25 points 2 days ago (3 children)
  • The Lord of the Rings was very consistent. Many people think that Return of the King is the best one.
  • Knives Out had a rather disappointing second part but the third one is amazing.

Yeah, that's all I can think of right now.

[โ€“] psycotica0@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Lord of the Rings barely counts, because not only were all three books out and classics before the movies started (obviously), but the three movies were basically worked on at the same time. It's nuts, but somehow they managed to do it.

So it's not like they released the first, got crazy hype, and then phoned everyone up and said "electric Boogaloo, you in?". They'd already shot most of the second and third by the time the first came out, as I recall.

Also I really liked Glass Onion ๐Ÿ˜›

[โ€“] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Like bttf 1 and 2 where filmed back to back and then released a year apart from each other. That was ambitious. Nothing based on books or prior proof. They just knew they had such a banger they did 2 movies right out of the gate.

[โ€“] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[โ€“] Pyrixas@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Early 2000s film-making was that crazy. The only other ambitious feat I know of (besides the BTTF example someone else mentioned) was that Matrix Reloaded and Revolutions both released in the same year of eachother, by a few months apart. Were they any good? Up for anyone's debate (but both far exceed Resurrections). That means, that they also were done in one very long shoot.

[โ€“] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Knives Out 2 is by far my favorite and I love all three. I've only laughed that hard at a movie a handful of times.

[โ€“] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 8 points 2 days ago

My main criticism about Glass Onion is that the twist only works because Blanc knows something from the start that the audience can't really figure out on their own. I prefer detective stories where the main character has the same opportunities to gather information as I have and if I pay close enough attention, I can figure out most of what happened before the big reveal.

But I'm glad that you liked it. Shows that the series caters to different tastes.

[โ€“] fireweed@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Glass Onion was disappointing?

[โ€“] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

At least to me and my friends who watched it with me. See my other reply for an explanation why. But of course, tastes differ and there seem to be quite a few people on here who liked it.