Technology
News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.
What doesn't fit here?
The core of the story has to be technology focused.
- If article mentions "AI" in a sentence and then talks about business economics that doesn't make it tech news.
- Gaming is too many layers removed from technology. There are many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Transporation is too many layers removed from technology. EVs while use many cool technologies have many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Entertainment is too many layers removed from technology. While sometimes it can fit here, business or cultural aspects of it are a better fit for dedicated communities.
- Cybersecurity. While it heavily focuses on technology, most of the time it's too technical for most people who are not already invested in it. Should be posted in a dedicated communities unless it has broader connection to other tech areas.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefix
Country prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
view the rest of the comments
Are you following the conversation? You changed it when someone asked why they would want to update it and the user answered their question. You than started a different conversation when you argued.
Of course it’s unlikely to happen, but it won’t happen if you just use the tv to stream to begin with
Okay, so you haven’t experienced it, so it’s not possible. Just like people not having their tv bricked…? Do you see the commonality of the conversation now? Or are you just going to cry that using a tv for streaming isn’t a good idea, because that seems to be the only point you’re making here. Which isn’t even remotely correct anyways. People have reasons for not using sticks and using their tv. You can argue if you want, but it just makes you look foolish.
The tv stick can also brick as well, so now you have two things, that’s a worse idea actually. So why add additional steps, with multiple failure points instead of one? Great idea dude lmao. Give your head a shake.
In this thread, people telling me to read the thread who have not read it themselves and accusing me of saying things other people have said. Please screen shot the comment I made where I asked why someone would update their TV. Do it. Show me where I (drcobaltjedi) said that.
Literally never said that.
Again this is on a post about TV's being bricked. Someone who is NOT ME suggested using a streaming stick who asserted that they cost $20 to avoid having bricked expensive tvs. I am making the statement of fact that replaceing a streaming stick costs less than a TV and that in the event an HDMI port somehow breaking isn't the end of the world since TVs are shipped with multiple HDMI ports so somehow if one breaks its still better to replace the less expensive streaming stick.
You both keep putting other peoples words in my mouth I'll send you both the "Redditorest person of the year" award.