Technology
News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.
What doesn't fit here?
The core of the story has to be technology focused.
- If article mentions "AI" in a sentence and then talks about business economics that doesn't make it tech news.
- Gaming is too many layers removed from technology. There are many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Transporation is too many layers removed from technology. EVs while use many cool technologies have many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Entertainment is too many layers removed from technology. While sometimes it can fit here, business or cultural aspects of it are a better fit for dedicated communities.
- Cybersecurity. While it heavily focuses on technology, most of the time it's too technical for most people who are not already invested in it. Should be posted in a dedicated communities unless it has broader connection to other tech areas.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefix
Country prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
view the rest of the comments
I literally mentioned it in my first comment in this thread. The literal first thing I said in this thread was:
Buddy the person who owns 5 smart tvs can clearly afford a new smart tv in their masion. I would have a hard time placing 5 tvs in a single house or appartment I have ever lived in or been in or any friend has lived in or been in. Where are you putting 5 TVs? Are they in your bathroom and kitchen? At that point the componding issue of expense is magnified in my favor. If they're all these brands facing bricking updates then yes it would still be better to have 5 streaming sticks since thats a 5 $20 replacement instead of 5 $500-5000 replacement.
It’s almost like everyone’s situation is different eh? So all you’re doing is saying everyone has to do things your way since that’s your experience. That’s asinine dude.
You asked questions, I answered them, and now you’re arguing since I’m different than you.
But bloviate dude lmfao.
And where are you buying your tcls? They’re $200 for a 4k 40”. I have one good tv in basement, and the rest are cheap ones. Kids, garage, living, bonus room. That’s 6 cheap TVs right there. 3 kids dude. And streaming sticks aren’t $20, they are closer to $50. So you’re lying to make your points.
Als kids wreck all kind of plug in ports, bet you never thought about that eh? You seriously worked IT and never had a single person who had a kid and fucked up a port? I seriously doubt that. What about usb ports? Those are also ports, and don’t claim none of those have failed or been broken.
Mother of fucking god read the thread. I never claimed streaming sticks were $20. Someone else did, and I ran with it since it was their prompt to set up this conversation. But fine they're $50 and an update bricks them. Its $50 to replace them which is somehow the worse option than spending $200 to replace a tv that gets bricked by an update.
Anyone who had their kid use their work laptop had it replaced witha work desktop computer that stayed at work, most people weren't plugging in and unplugging their keyboards and mice every 15 minutes and hell when I ws a child I never fucking with cables to the point of breaking the ports. Fun fact TVs can be mounted above where small children can reach.
I still don't understand what is hard to understand here. These TVs get an update that bricks them, the TV no worky now, TV no worky because of update. TV no update if TV have no internet. Streaming stick let TV still have netflix, streaming stick cost less than TV, if streaming stick brick then streaming stick replaced, streaming stick cost less than tv, tv have many hdmi port.