this post was submitted on 04 May 2026
323 points (98.8% liked)

Science Fiction

18706 readers
18 users here now

Welcome to /c/ScienceFiction

December book club canceled. Short stories instead!

We are a community for discussing all things Science Fiction. We want this to be a place for members to discuss and share everything they love about Science Fiction, whether that be books, movies, TV shows and more. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow.

  1. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.
  2. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.
  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed
  4. Put (Spoilers) in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers.
  5. Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread.

Lemmy World Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That, and the bombers in space in The Last Jedi.

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I have no problem with the bombers.

From a functional design it works. There's artificial gravity inside the bomb bay and once they fall out of the floor they will continue in space on their inertia.

From a style point of view it works. Space battles in Star Wars was always a love letter to world war 2 dog fights. They are planes in space, not space ships. Always have been.

[–] Geldaran@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

The love letter to dogfights thing doesn't excuse complete stupidity. I'm not expecting Babylon 5 level of good space battles, but at the very least they could have treated it as a "escort the torpedo boats" fight and not a "bombing ground targets but in spaaaaaace". Some one should have taken one look at the script/plan for that scene and said, "No, that's stupid."

[–] CybertoothTiger@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What about the lasers with bullet drop in the same movie?

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not familiar with that.

Important to recognise they don't shoot lasers in Star Wars. Their energy bolts have mass.

[–] CybertoothTiger@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Honest question then - would the relatively small rebel (resistance?) ships have enough mass to generate a gravitational field that would have affected those energy bolts? Because they're in the vacuum of space IIRC.

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Star Wars is first and foremost a fantasy series, not proper sci fi. Again, I don't know the specific thing being referred to here, but this is a film series where people with magic powers fight with swords. Things that look cool take precedence over things that make scientific sense.

[–] ToduTony@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Erm actually it's super heated plasma bolts which still have mass and are affected by gravity. At long range a noticable drop is still possible.

[–] detren@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

No cause those were cool