this post was submitted on 08 May 2026
152 points (95.8% liked)

Fediverse

24818 readers
21 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml
wakest@lemmy.ml
152
PieFedeology - Ideological Purity in PieFed (lemmy.ml)
submitted 6 days ago by Loco_Mex@sh.itjust.works to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
124 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

PieFed has done it once again, this time adding 'warning' labels for opposing ideological perspectives, well at least one; Can't find any warnings for fascism or capitalism ๐Ÿค”

This can be demonstrated here: https://piefed.social/c/globalnews/p/1697164/sudan-civil-war-spills-over-into-neighboring-chad-peoples-dispatch

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] luciferofastora@feddit.org 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

without the walls listening in and making decisions about doors.

I'm not sure what you mean with "walls listening in" when we're talking about a public forum, but the doors are perfectly openable. As the creator stated elsewhere, you can unban individual pages or delete the whole list. The "decision" is more like a suggestion.

I understand you'd rather not have that suggestion preconfigured. I personally see no harm in it.

[โ€“] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago

I'm not sure what you mean with "walls listening in" when we're talking about a public forum, but the doors are perfectly openable.

What I mean is the code infrastructure of the public forum doesn't need to do what the users operating the platform do. These sorts of flags and tags for judgements on commentary have a direct impact on interactions between users, which is the door part of analogy.