this post was submitted on 09 May 2026
716 points (97.9% liked)

Fediverse

42015 readers
219 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It became the only reliable source of information I had. People posted links with a minimal amount of commentary, picking and choosing the best content from other social media networks. They’re not doing it to “build a brand” because that’s not a thing in the Fediverse. It’s too disjointed to be a place to build a newsletter subscription base.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] r4venw@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

PieFed keeps track of how many upvotes and downvotes you give, displays that on your profile and if you downvote too much it takes away your downvote button. That happened to me after a weekend of use. This is Lemmy. There's a lot here that needs downvoting.

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Are you downvoting to disagree or are you downvoting because it’s not contributing to the conversation?

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This question shows the inherent flaw with putting any value beyond the function of voting, which is just list ranking.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago

Some instances would say down voting at all is inherently flawed, and it is healthier to accomplish ranking by upvoting and moderation alone.

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As soon as it becomes infeasible to read every comment, downvoting to disagree creates echo chambers and encourages groupthink.

[–] DanWolfstone@leminal.space 6 points 3 days ago

I find the same, though I, and I hope others, use it as an "I agree/this adds to the conversation" button and downvotes exclusively as a "this doesnt add to the conversation or is misinformation" button. I also appreciate seeing the down votes rather than an aggregated score.

[–] Snoopy@piefed.social -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The full explanation is the same thing. Your context adds nothing.

Your current attitude is 1.0, the highest possible and your reputation is in the tens of thousands. If you ever decide to cast another downvote then it'll be accepted.

I think you’re missing this part.

[–] Goferking0@ttrpg.network 2 points 2 days ago

That's exactly what they said though?