this post was submitted on 09 May 2026
1397 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

84569 readers
3846 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

600,000 people sent in $100 deposits for this thingβ€”!😧 (Dumbass is laughing all the way to the bank. )

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 116 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The clearest signal yet that buyers may never see either a phone or their money came with a revised terms of service published on 6 April 2026. The updated document states explicitly that paying a deposit 'does not constitute a completed purchase and does not create a binding legal contract.' The payment is described as 'a conditional opportunity to buy the device if Trump Mobile eventually chooses to sell it,' with the company retaining all control over whether a phone is produced at all.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 82 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That is absolutely fucking hilarious.

I also don't think contracts work that way, otherwise that shit would be WAY more common. heh. But I'm also pretty sure nobody will see a penny back anyway.

I'd feel bad for them if they weren't fucking in the middle of turning our nation into a fascist hellhole.

[–] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 3 days ago (4 children)

that's how terms of service work on the internet. companies alter the terms whenever and however they like, and often to the detriment of the end user. it's technically not legal, but they do it anyway.

[–] voytrekk@sopuli.xyz 41 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If a tech company changes the agreement, you are able to stop using the service if you don't like the new terms. With this phone people have already put money down for it. As long as they didn't agree to these new terms, they should be eligible for a refund if the product never ships.

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah sure, but how long will it take until they see any money?

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"We can offer you a discount on the new model?"

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

"For an additional fee"

Things like Google and Facebook that don't charge any money can get away with this, but I highly doubt these people will be able to weasel out of this when actual money changes hands. Otherwise we'd have seen lots of companies doing this by now.

[–] SavinDWhales@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

it's technically not legal, but they do it anyway

That sounds like a Trump enterprise.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I don't think they're allowed to take past money like that, though. They can increase monthly fees, sure.

but of course as we all know, laws don't matter in this instance.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Let me know how the class action goes.

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 11 points 3 days ago

His kids will have bankrupted whatever shell company they spun up for this whole grift.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I don't agree. The clearest signaal that the buyers would be screwed was the Trump brand name. He's grift incarnate.