this post was submitted on 10 May 2026
64 points (97.1% liked)

Privacy

5632 readers
289 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] myster0n@feddit.nl 32 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The "record penalty" is still less than the profit GM made selling the data.

[–] JenIsBringingTheDrugs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

General Motors agreed to pay $12.75 million in civil penalties for selling driving data of hundreds of thousands of California motorists to data brokers, allegedly without their consent.

[...] made approximately $20 million from the unlawful sale of their data between 2020 and 2024. The information included names, location information, driving behavior, and contact information

Yep

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Cheesus, I'll never understand this. How can the fine be lower than the unlawful gain? Shouldn't paying back the unlawful gain always be the base from which one goes up?

No need to explain, these are rhetorical questions. I know how fucked up the US legal system is esp. wrt corporations.

load more comments (1 replies)