this post was submitted on 10 May 2026
849 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

84569 readers
3844 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pulsar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Kevin is a POS and I really doubt this DataCenter will ever be built. Having said that, this article is also full of fearmongering trash.

”Turn out, it could create a massive heat island capable of devastating the area’s ecology, said Robert Davies, a physics professor at Utah State University.”

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

this article is also full of fearmongering trash.

”Turn out, it could create a massive heat island capable of devastating the area’s ecology, said Robert Davies, a physics professor at Utah State University.”

I work in the O&G industry. "Heat islands" are a legitimate concern for both refineries and power plants. Failure to limit the heat emissions in a given area can require personal to wear more protective gear just to get inside the facilities. Alternatively, you have to shut parts of the plant down to get people safely into and out of it for maintenance.

It absolutely has an impact on the surrounding ecology. And you can see the brownfields that certain decommissioned sites create, stretching for miles in every direction.

For a state like Utah, with a relatively low per-capita population and some of the country's last pristine wilderness, rolling out a bunch of industrial facilities to suck up the potable water and blast the area with vented coolant would have a very real and noticeable impact.

The problem is that we've done this cycle of development and decimation so many times in our industrial era that "doing what we've always done" gets written off as fear-mongering, because we no longer recognize the impact.

[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

You may want to start taking this shit seriously because this type of casual acceptance is exactly what these capitalists are hoping for.

If this "fear-mongering" helps push for better climate policy, there is no downside, as acting when we don't need to is better than not acting when we fucking should be.

[–] immutable@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well heat islands are a real thing. If you put 9GW of energy into a data center and dont want to fry the electronics you have to expel that heat somewhere.

Data centers often expel their heat into the surrounding ecology via air con and liquid cooling.

This is selling fear because this data center won’t obey the laws of thermodynamics?

[–] Xella@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

That's why it will be built. RIP Utah