this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
7 points (88.9% liked)

Asklemmy

54273 readers
526 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] blackbrook@mander.xyz 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

A lot of different things can produce anger. Frustration can produce anger. Stress can produce anger.

Often things that may be no one's fault (or no ones but your own) and yet it's often a natural reaction to direct that anger at whoever or whatever it's in front of you.

[โ€“] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Right but I think their def is not robust or close enough. Anger is based on activating you to focus on someone or something hurting you or causing danger for you

[โ€“] blackbrook@mander.xyz 2 points 13 hours ago

I would just make the general comment, in response to reading the various exchanges in this thread, that there is a lot of theory around this stuff, and yes there are studies that support some of it, but these theories are by no means something that should be taken as 'fact.' To the extent you find them useful in navigating the terrain they attempt to map, great, but I would avoid getting locked into these ideas in figuring out how to deal with emotions (your own or others) in real life.

[โ€“] Krudler@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anger is regarded as a secondary emotion.

There's no universal explanation for what provokes anger in a person, it's generally underlying, unprocessed feelings unique to the individual.

[โ€“] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Was it meant by that, like does it constitutionally require a primary emotion and what are those?

[โ€“] Krudler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Emotions are somewhat intangible sensations that you can observe within some perceptive core of your being. We call that our consciousness. Typically the various types of emotions are governed by your body's systems using chemical signaling. Most emotions felt in the consciousness also express themselves through various sensations in different areas of the body. For example, face getting flushed, frowning, clenched fists, dilated pupils, changing heart rate, tingling sensations, etc. So in a sense it's very real to say that one can feel one's feelings.

It's fair to say that anger requires a primary driving emotion that is not processed or expressed well. Anger is somewhat of a maladaptive process within the human psyche.

Reasons for anger can be various, some examples are feelings of powerlessness, fear, resentment, jealousy, uncertainty, abandonment. One positive thing anger can do is act as an indicator that there is some underlying feeling that should be explored.