this post was submitted on 10 May 2026
849 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

84569 readers
3844 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

For comparison, a blast furnace making steel uses on the order of 3600 GWh/yr and the energy comes primarily from coal.

9Gwh is a high number for a datacenter, but industrial processes use much more and much dirtier energy.

That's also one datacenter and the largest. Whereas there are many, many blast furnaces running all over the world.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

9gw if run 24/7 (capacity utilization is actually low on average in US) is 551.88 twh/year. 1500x. Natural gas is not that much cleaner than coal from co2/ghg warming perspective.