this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
474 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

84700 readers
3535 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 266 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Anyone else remember when Google bragged about never being worried about storage as you watched your storage free count, grow and grow and grow.

[–] elvith@feddit.org 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

TBF when Iade an account there to check it out back then, they offered about 1GB. But that was huge for the time back then

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 22 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I remember when they offered 1GB, was at a time when I think the standard hotmail was like either 10 MB or 100 MB, and they made the announcement on april 1st.

Then did it via an invite system.

You know now that I think of it, I wonder what would have happened if google plus had used a similar playbook to that. Seems like with gmail google knew the "exclusivity" was a selling point. Facebook grew big via similar strategies (only these special college students can get it, ok a few more colleges can), meanwhile google plus was "HEY, USE GOOGLE PLUS NOW, Oh you aren't using it yet, we made your youtube account a google plus account now, so now you have an account please use it now!

While social media in general is toxic. I do feel design wise google plus was leaps and bounds ahead of facebook at the time. Circles is IMO the feature that would have made social media actually semi-useful. (IE post your video game content to gamer friends, fun activities to friends, and not putting any job risking content to bosses etc...).

[–] mimavox@piefed.social 1 points 20 hours ago

Yes, I thought Google Plus was way better, but that didn't matter since exactly everyone used Facebook back then.

[–] Lucelu2@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

I liked Google Circles. Was sad it went away. It definitely made sure that my interactions/upvotes on Aunt Nancy's account wasn't seen by MIL who hates her guts and deems my interaction with her a sign of betrayal.

[–] elvith@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Google Plus was invite only in the beginning, though

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago

I think so, I don't remember how long that was. But I do distinctly remember the era where it was shoved down everyone's throat, which I have to say stuck with people far more. Telling people that they must use it, generated so much hatred for it it was insane.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They tried that with Google Wave.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think marketing was wave's problem... nobody understood what the hell wave was. I used it for a few months.. and I can't tell you what the hell it was.

[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Also got into and and used it, I'd describe it as Gdocs multiplayer beta

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 day ago

And that was the end of the wave for invite started social media.

[–] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Fellow OG. I remember. The day it was close to hitting 5gb I was watching it like an every guy watches their car odometer as it hits some magic number. It was worthy of celebration.

1gb back then was 5x the allowed size for my exchange mailbox at work. HUGE!

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Remember Dont Be Evil???

Rotfl

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 points 8 hours ago

I wonder if every phone has a Mossad style detonation trigger hidden inside, and if it is rigged to blow at a certain time.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

they went from that to datamining your emails and your google storage, now they invested so much into AI, they want sell even more services.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I remember. I'm also paying Google $2 a month for 100gb. Fucking bastards. But can you point me to 100GB for less?

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You're going to have a hard time beating $2/mo unless you roll it into something else like blackblaze ($100/year for unlimited storage), Microsoft office 365 ($100/year with 1 TB of OneDrive), etc. If your space is going to photos, the speed and responsiveness of Google photos far outpaces some of the alternatives (cough cough OneDrive).

Self hosting is a viable alternative if you're interested in having more control/local storage or if you are interested in this kind of thing and want to do it/dabble in it as a hobby.

I personally built a NAS, which will take far too long to amortize vs just paying $2/mo. I chose this route because I value a local backup and because a NAS can a bit of a lifestyle product. "It can double as a server!". Sounds fun, but I would want to build the thing I host which will also take time so... You could potentially build a NAS that will average out to $2 or less a month if you have spare parts or score some used parts cheap. Odds are that route could also be used for self hosting.

[–] Lucelu2@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Microslop OneDrive wants $20/m for 1T. However you slice it, we pay for them to back stuff up on a cloud that we used to just back up on our own physical storage. This also gives them access to all our info/pics etc to scan for their AI bots.

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

50372364.45 GB and growing. It will always be free.

[–] DanWolfstone@leminal.space 1 points 1 day ago

What have you GOT in there, damn

[–] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago

If you did the annual security 'check-up' you got an extra 2GB (maybe it was just 1GB and I did it a couple of years).

[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean, OneDrive did the same, except their tactic was just to delete your files instead of store them, instead of increasing it…