this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
514 points (80.5% liked)
memes
21264 readers
2327 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Fields are just as dead as parking lots. Just prettier
Pretty sure the green stuff is alive, actually.
It is and you're right, but there point op was making (perhaps not very well) is that a plain monoculture grass field is about as biodiverse as a car park. In order to be a sustainable ecological habitat for life more is needed than just grass.
Water, trees, bushes, flowering plants etc. These provide shade, places to nest and food that is needed for life to thrive.
A field is essentially an ecological wasteland.
Its crazy how walking into a corn field can feel like a Martian wasteland on the surface
It needs to be native plants too. Just letting whatever grow on the grass often ends up being roadside weeds and invasive species, which is more diverse than just grass but pales in comparison to a truly naturalized praire or woodland.
Fields are made to only maintain life for what is grown on it. There is very little life there besides the plants. Biodiversity wise, they could as well be parking lots. They just look like nature, because, as you say, they are green.
Even that, takes nature away. Birds that naturally nest on flat ground, can't breed there any more, because moderns crops grow faster than they can grow their chicks.
Like, I get what you're saying if it comes to lawns. But I know no field like the above one where nothing but ode type of grass grows. All the fields I know have multiple kinds of grass.
And the animals will come to that kind of field.
This is really freakin' obvious around my part of the world. Farmers don't tend to plant winter cover crops, but rather leave acres and acres of barren soil after the corn harvest.
It is the crops that kill diversity though. Baren fields may actually be better for wildlife
True, the turkeys, sandhill cranes, and seagulls browse the bare soil, so at least some animals benefit. I'm thinking about it from the perspective of somebody who sees green crop plants and thinks it's healthful nature. The empty fields provide a better visual indication of the actual devastation caused by industrial ag.
Except they aren't at all. Fields are host to all sorts of life. Besides the plants that grow there, insects, reptiles, small mammals and the birds that feed on all of them are all found in fields.
Not if the ag industry has anything to say about it, though…
Not every field is a sprayed power crop, you know. You folks who only see the most extreme division of black and white in everything are mentally ill and the screen time is making you worse.
It’s not black and white though; saying fields are biodiverse is an erroneous simplification.
Fields can be biodiverse, but pushing for increased production inherently drives that down. Big ag will make the field deadly to anything other than the target crop to make conditions most favorable to that crop.
We grow subsistence levels of rice each year and choose methods that promote biodiversity. Our paddies and surrounding areas are host to all sorts of life; fish, frogs, snails, crabs, all that attract their own predictors. But even something that seems like table stakes such as using a combine to harvest instead of harvesting by hand is destructive to the ecosystem of the paddy.
…but then imagine if all the rice in the world was harvested by hand instead of by machine. Would it even be productive enough to supply the world? It’s unimaginably more time consuming.
To someone who lives in the country, surrounded by farms of various types, you sound like you've never even been outside.
To someone who lives on a farm, so do you.
No - Fields are biodiversity deserts, and farmers want it like this. They look pretty and look like nature, but could as well be sand
You sure think you know a lot behind your keyboard. You should really go outside more often, because you are absolutely incorrect.
Sounds like you think you know even more though?
https://wikifarmer.com/library/en/article/biodiversity-vs-monoculture-why-the-way-we-farm-matters-more-than-ever
I live in the country, surrounded by farms and timber property. There is life fucking everywhere. I'll bet you live in a concrete hell and have never been outside of the city.
Lol, look at this guy. Even the 'forested' area around him is a monoculture that looks nothing like real woods. Mate, many of us here on lemmy live or have lived in areas like you describe, or in or near areas that are actual nature. Hell, I'm sure there are plenty like me, who have actually worked in those fields. Unless you're on a rare farm co-op that really cares about biodiversity and promoting 'natural' ways of the ecosystem you're living in, you're basically experiencing the equivalent of this but for a crop field.
My forested area contains all the biodiversity the southeastern united states has to offer. I get a tax break for keeping it that way. You seem to be confused however that every piece of land everywhere is being used for something and that's just flatly incorrect. Maybe it is where you're at, but not here. When I say surrounded I mean within some miles. I'm an hour from town, there's lots between here and there.
I live right next to two fields and in a village with 30 houses, surrounded by fields.
You just prove the point