this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
1065 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

84830 readers
4094 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

• Proton VPN has hit back at Canada's proposed Bill C-22

• The proposed legislation could require VPNs to log user metadata

• NordVPN and Windscribe have also slammed the bill

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 2 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

name a VPN company that obstructed a federal court order

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

source? I have heard good things about Mullvad but I'm pretty sure they would not break laws

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

sounds like they complied with the court orders? Proton also doesn't log IPs, unless ordered by court. I'm willing to bet that if a court ordered Mullvad to start logging all traffic, they would comply, at least until they were able to move jurisdictions or something

[–] XLE@piefed.social 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Watch the Proton evangelist move the goalposts they set

[–] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

from the start I asked for a company that obstructed court order. Show me where I moved goalposts

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I'm holding a company to account for promising this.

We are a neutral and safe haven for your personal data, committed to defending your freedom.

[–] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

So you thought this meant they would break the law? Nobody else expects that. There are more reasonable ways to interpret the messaging