290
this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
290 points (100.0% liked)
Linux
17596 readers
393 users here now
Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
-
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
-
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
-
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
-
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
-
No NSFW adult content
-
Follow general lemmy guidelines.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's not a delay. It's a trojan horse. First you fuck with the closed source OSes and then later when everyone is cool with that you can just do the same to linux and say "look at windows, they're fine. you'll be fine too."
That's true my only question is with Linux its physically impossible to implement due to two questions.
When does Linux become an operating system? The answer is no one knows since it can be a full DE or a kennel and init system and a shell and there is no standard init system who do you regulate.
Who owns Linux? The answer is when you install Linux at that time you are also forking Linux so the answer is you own it. So its no one and everyone at the same time. If north Korea can use Linux and make their own distro and sanctions can't do anything about it. This law can't stop anyone at home or distro based in another Country from just ripping out any chuck of code that is put in by this law.
If the current draft passes, it does something as well. Websites that want or have to rely on the signal will do it. Linux users will have to implement something if they want to access them. Parents that want to limit the access for their children on linux will be looking for implementations and use them. Everything happening without forcing the distributions.
Have you read the bill? This is explicitly NOT aimed at websites but at apps. I’m not defending it, but be angry about what it actually is.
I think it's more that someone managed to explain to them in words they could understand how unenforceable it was, and having it be unenforceable for some weakens the law's standing as a whole. Now it doesn't because they aren't required to try.
As I posted elsewhere:
When I spoke with Wicks’ staffers in charge of this, they said that the reason behind it is that California has age restrictions for various kinds of sites and applications (no porn apps under 18, restrictions on social media and chat for kids, etc). The various big tech companies said they didn’t want to be responsible for figuring out how to track and verify all that, so they asked for something that would mean they didn’t have to.
The bill was originally written with that as the background, and they specifically added language about just trusting what was entered and not collecting identification past that.
I got the impression that the staffers were intelligent, thoughtful people, just with no experience or knowledge of non big tech stuff. They have been living in the Apple/Microsoft/Google world like most normies. They were very surprised and intrigued when I told them that Debian collects no information on users. One said they were interested in giving Linux a try because of how bad Windows 11 is.
Normies ruin everything no matter how well-intentioned through a great deal of ignorance. Normies shouldn't be allowed to make laws about anything. Only subject matter experts.