this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
46 points (94.2% liked)
Selfhosted
60024 readers
829 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam.
-
Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title.
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Kubernetes makes distributed storage easy.
Basically, all the components get deployed for you, since that's part of what kubernetes is good at.
And then, services/containers can provision storage by requesting storage via making a "claim" and whatever distributed storage providee you have gives it to you.
Have you tried using Ceph or other distributed storage systems in your kubernetes cluster?
Well, I run a one node cluster...
But yes, I did use ceph via rook-ceph, because Openstack (a locally hosted AWS alternative), at least the Kubernetes version, wanted a ceph "cluster" to store stuff on.
Longhorn is much easier. Although again, my "cluster" was one node. I deployed it because I wanted snapshots.
Wow cool! I believe you're the first person I've met that actually used a cluster FS (in their homelab at least). I looked into it myself but it felt like nobody was really using it so I didn't bother.
Does it involve much more work or is it a fairly transparent replacement to traditional storage options? Assuming one is already using Kubernetes. I'm wondering if it's worth it to switch to a cluster FS for everything, like Radicale or Tiddlywiki.
On kubernetes it's pretty much the same amount of work. Every possible storage option exposes a generalized, abstracted "storageclass", from which storage can be provisioned and mounted into containers.
https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/storage/storage-classes/
Very cool, I'll have to spin up some VMs and test it out myself. Thanks for all the info!