this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
52 points (93.3% liked)
Asklemmy
54461 readers
616 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Also let's not talk about white families using the "Cherokee ancestor" excuse to hide a black ancestor as a part to justify darker features. I've seen this happen as well.
In Australia, it's the opposite. My family has a story of an Afghani ancestor that was used to hide indigenous Australian heritage.
Though maybe that's the same, because it's hiding black ancestry behind pretend non black ancestry...
I just discovered Native Australians are considered black. I thought they were considered a distinct race since they're genetically not Sub-Saharan African but South Asians
Different heritage, but very much considered black. Australia has a whole racist history that marginalises indigenous Australians explicitly on their blackness...
Yeah it blew my mind when a few times I was called black in Australia when I am of Indian heritage. One even made a joke about my penis being larger!
In Britain, Asian means someone from Indian/Pakistani part of area of Asia, whereas in North America and Australia it means Chinese/Japanese parts of Asia.
Blackness/Whiteness is an interesting concept - it's remarkably fluid, especially with changes in time and place. Race isn't the same as ethnicity or genetics, or a direct result of it, although racists often try to claim it is - a stark example of this in Western societies like the US and Australia would be how they categorize Italian and Greek peoples, Slavic peoples, or ethnically-Jewish peoples - the idea of whether or not each of these is White has largely shifted over time, often as a group stops being the current biggest immigration demographic. The USA even had a concept of "Black Irish", which originally meant a post-Famine Irish refugee. Human races are ultimately just social classes, not a biological concept.
Another aspect, related to this thread, is hypodescent. In some societies (it's not a universal thing!), if a child has a Black parent and a White parent, is the child Black or White, or another label entirely? As mentioned in that article, some US states used to legally define someone as Black even if only 1 of their 16 great-great-grandparents were Black.
This is a huge part of it.
For my family it was the native kids that were forced into adoption with white families to force them to assimilate. We have photos of my dutch pilgrim family with daughters who are plainly native and in their photos as adults they often really lighten their skin on the face but don’t do the hands… it’s really bizarre to see