this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
52 points (93.3% liked)
Asklemmy
54461 readers
616 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Not that I think you are wrong, but DNA tests dont necessarily paint the whole picture the way they companies selling them would like you to believe.
They've gotten better over time, but unless you have a bunch of samples you know for a fact are 100% Blackfoot (which already inherently doesnt make sense because the Blackfoot are a confederacy of different peoples), you have to just do your best to reconstruct what you consider to be "Blackfoot DNA". People groups are also never static the way racists think they are.
In your case, for all you know, you could have had a few different Blackfoot ancestors who had offspring with French traders in the 1700s, or an English frontiersman in the 1800s. The offspring could have just been born and raised in the tribe and considered 100% part of the tribe, even if it turns out their DNA was 25% "Blackfoot".
That's fair. I am aware that there is lack of a genome for a diverse group of people like the Blackfoot to compare my results with.
I'm just very suspicious of a white family claiming native ancestry.
For Xmas I got my grandfather's ancestry done. On my mother's side. The side claiming the native.
Now I do know for a fact that family members did geneology tracing many years ago and it was determined that line was German.
Like they have documents and stuff. Was a group of family members who did the research. (Funny thing is they first thought we were dutch because the origin country was Deutschland.)
Anywho. My grandfather's report said he was only like 7% German. And mostly from Cambria (English/Welsh area).
It did make me a little suspicious of the accuracy since this German ancestry was verified independently.
I went through a different company for his compared to mine. You can import the DNA from one test to another company and they will run it through their system. For a fee.
Probably won't be doing that. But did consider it.