this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
279 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

85080 readers
3884 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I really hope that some of these big players in the AI market will stay private. There are already enough headwinds to them being a force of good in the world without having to report to shareholders of the lowest denominator.

[–] fpslem@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

I assume they are all running for the public exit because they are losing money faster than they can raise it and don't have any reliable business models to which they can transition in the near term. If they can't become profitable, the next best thing is to go public while the hype is hot and to cash out ASAP.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You mean you don't want every AI company to be driven by shareholder interests?

[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

There was an interesting podcast recently from freakonomics about Epic software and how it’s always been private. It reinforced my perception that companies do better for humanity when they stay private.

Most C corps have the same tragedy of the masses problem that we face with pollution and resource scarcity. Not to mention that the average anything is mediocre. So, in a word, yes.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

They at least have the freedom to do better, many do not. Shareholders don't give a fuck about anything but profits and made it illegal for a company to do otherwise.