this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
233 points (99.2% liked)

technology

24394 readers
201 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] larrikin99@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago (13 children)

That's not an accurate way to paraphrase what MIT Technology Review is saying.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

Yeah what MIT is actually saying here is that because solar creation is too efficient it is actually creating an economic situation in which switching to solar costs more than the profit that would be made from it.

That wouldn't be an issue if they just allowed Chinese solar panels but without Chinese production it's an economic issue with capitalism.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 3 points 1 week ago

No that’s not what they’re saying. They’re saying that generating loads and loads of power when no one needs it is leading to power companies having to charge people for feeding into the grid to stop them from doing so, instead of paying them.

Solars biggest problem is that without batteries it’s basically useless now, and grid scale batteries don’t exist, and there’s no real outlook where they are.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)