this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
204 points (100.0% liked)

technology

24389 readers
326 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A German court has ruled that Google is directly liable for what its AI search overviews say. Previous case law shielding search engine operators from liability doesn't apply to AI overviews.

michael-laugh

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UmbraVivi@hexbear.net 35 points 3 days ago (3 children)

How would AI search results be vetted? Even if you had the entirety of the Philippines on your bankroll, you wouldn't be able to have every AI search result checked. This is not the same as public facebook profiles or youtube videos, which rely heavily on user reports for moderation. This is about procedurally generated search results that only one person sees. I don't see how AI search overviews survive this.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 12 points 3 days ago

Just feed the results back into an AI that checks the results! doggirl-smart

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How would AI search results be vetted?

It's not about that, fines are part of doing business and large corporations will often leverage certain regulations to capture larger swaths of a market because only they can afford the fines.

If it's a $5 fine for every reported bad response, Google can just eat that while literally anyone else is suddenly instantly put out of business.

Same with the age verification stuff. They aren't planning on actually making things safer, just collecting data and paying the fines for not doing the things they're supposed to do.

[–] UmbraVivi@hexbear.net 13 points 3 days ago

It's not a fine, it's legal liability for whatever the LLM says. The linked article is about a defamation lawsuit Google lost because the LLM hallucinated sources. If this becomes a precedent case, it could lead to people specifically getting the search overview AI to hallucinate something so they can sue Google for free money.

The main reason I think this could kill AI search overview is because it's just not a core feature. Google doesn't need it. Could they afford all the legal fees this would cost them? Probably. But they could also just get rid of it without losing any of their marketshare.

[–] Salah@hexbear.net 6 points 3 days ago

There are many ways to decrease the chance of harmful results. I’m not a tech nerd but clearly the goal here is for google to implement more safety guards and possibly do constant tests for AI results which are both only feasible for Google because it’s a tech giant.

For chatgpt in the beginning there were people employed to continuously read chatgpt responses to peoples questions and to quickly remove it if there was harmful material in it.