this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
151 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

43095 readers
149 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bryndos@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Looks like the total n c1,500 was for all known projects in the dataset. The quartiles were determined from within areas with known projects.

So the Q4 range ( $133-250k median household), represents the 25% projects in the richest areas of areas that had projects in them. Hence n is 365/366 "projects" in each each group.

If there are tracts with median hh incomes way above that, but no projects, then "resistance" rate is unknown or even undefined.

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 1 points 4 days ago

Thank you for the explanation.