If they widened the roads to be able have space to make the lane id say it is. If they just threw it in there and made a uncomfortable spot to bike id say not.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

And millions of drivers would disagree. The study is clear. If a driver doesn't fear hitting something they mostly disregard painted lanes. Without protection, bikers fear the lane with good reason.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I didnt say they wouldn't. But its still infrastructure if they widened the roads for it.

[–] DaleGribble88@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago

But since automobiles use it and bicyclist don't, the point is that makes it more car infrastructure not bicycle infrastructure

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

And important that the bike lane doesn't go over sewer grates 🤦

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

That sir is not a bike lane hahaha.