this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
23 points (60.7% liked)
Asklemmy
54604 readers
452 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The poor turnout for Hillary and Kamala suggests they actually do have some opinions on who the leader is.
No group is a monolith.
Yeah americans genuinely would rather have a rapist as a president than a woman, amazing. (jokes aside, you are of course correct that this immediately disproves that theory that people don't care who the leader is)
Between War Criminals and Rapist War criminals, Americans definitely prefer the Rapist War Criminals.
Don't get me started on how pathetic it was for the non-rapist war criminals to invite one of the most infamous war criminals to their campaign, instead of being, uk, not war criminals
Americans would rather vote for someone who lies about being anti war, than a fucking bloodthirsty neoliberal war monger? Weird.