this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
248 points (93.4% liked)

Technology

85463 readers
4142 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RiverRabbits@lemmy.blahaj.zone -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

we don't need opensource AI, we need to destroy AI

[–] jerakor@startrek.website 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You can run AI without causing environmental problems just like you can drive cars without burning fossil fuels and you can have industrial production without creating pollutants.

All of that just cuts into the profits though.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Then prove it. The whole system starting from creation to use. Otherwise, this is just a thought experiment in the same vein as the debatelords who say "buh murder can be ethical in some cases".

While real people are suffering in reality thanks to the toy you like, the fantasy deflections just enable that harm.

[–] RiverRabbits@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the way the technology is run and built is in itself despicable. It is an abomination.

[–] Nouvellalia@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So is modern food production. Doesn't mean stop eating.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

This is a creepy statement. Human life is not equatable to a billionaire's toy, and it is dangerously immoral to suggest it is.

[–] jerakor@startrek.website 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

The fact that consumers have LLM garbage shoved in their face doesn't mean that the exponential increase in other ML use cases isn't driving life saving technology. The COVID vaccine only deployed as fast as it did because of AI ML. 20% of surgeries right now are robot assisted and all of those use AI ML.

On a personal level I've been able to move my family to FOSS because of LLMs. LLMs are very good at understanding how open source software works and translating the workflows to human language. I personally can read man pages but others in my family honestly don't want to have to in order to just watch a show on AppleTV. I can do this with a small local LLM running on a low wattage micro server.

We are seeing LLMs enabling us easily to overwrite the proprietary software in our home devices and take back hardware and improve repairability so we can stop producing so much E Waste. And the more that companies use LLM code to slop up their embedded devices the easier it becomes.