Linux

65872 readers

484 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago

MODERATORS

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

170

The security situation with the Arch Linux AUR got a lot worse (www.gamingonlinux.com)

submitted 4 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

88 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

But why? Arch isn't a server distro and their users usually know how to keep their secrets save. A FUD campaign?

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

Sometimes it's as simple as "because they can".

They can do this so they did. Its likely no deeper then that.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I kinda doubt that people who think AUR is a good idea are good at keeping their credentials secure.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Then you also think the whole bunch of source-based distros (LFS, Gentoo) is a bad idea?

[–] sonalder@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 days ago

AUR is community-maintained packages intentionally designed to shift security responsibility to users. Without pre-installation vetting, meaning anyone can submit anything on there, making it perfect for malware distribution.

Of course all code is visible for inspection, community voting exists, and malicious packages can be reported and removed which limit malicious action.

But now we have LLM that can generate (and distribute) malware and do pretty good code obfuscation so I am not convinced by this model. Honestly I never felt comfortable using AUR (so I avoid it) because I'm not technical enough to review all the code my machine runs.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 4 points 4 days ago

No, I don't think those share AURs glaring security problems.