this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
318 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

85515 readers
4301 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] emb@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"We built the phone in between" [a smart phone and dumb phone] is a pretty appealing tag line. In the last half of the 2010s, when I finally dragged myself into getting an actual smart phone, I really wished I could get a flip phone that was more capable. The feature phones still on the market at the time seemed to be right out of 2003.

This implementation seems a little off. It has the flip form factor, and can run most android apps, great! But then it sounds like they arbitrarily block browsers and 'social media'? I think just leave them out by default, and let people go that route if they want it. The form factor already limits how well some of those would work.

[–] other_cat@piefed.zip 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Agreed, it's an odd move when so much else about the phone is being marketed as having the user's interests at heart. If you scratch a bit and squint at the wording they're using, though, it feels more and more like the CEO has his own idea of how people should be using their phones and is pushing that. The fact that it is more privacy respecting is incidental to the fact. I could be wrong, but that's the vibe I've certainly gotten.

It's too bad. I wouldn't mind having a phone with no social media but no browser is probably going to be a dealbreaker for me. Their FAQ says it's basically a way of 'cheating' to get to social media sites and that's incredibly condescending. I probably just want to look up if a nearby store is still open or something.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

the CEO has his own idea of how people should be using their phones and is pushing that.

He does and he is. I've watched Perifractic's channel for awhile and he is really very strident about "digital detox" on account of his smartphone use negatively effecting his mental health. This phone is made for Peri specifically; he just happens to be selling it.

(Which I'm fine with, by the way. I hope it does well; I'd like to see the new Commodore stick around a little longer.)

[–] Brimstone@lemmy.ml 3 points 21 hours ago

I mean the iPhone was what Steve Jobs wanted.

If there’s a market for it then leave them to it

[–] other_cat@piefed.zip 3 points 21 hours ago

You know what, that's fair.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't want more capability in general. I kinda want less. like no calendar and such. what I do want is the dumb phone to be able to act as a cellular hotspot for my laptop but I would like it to be able to do it and stay sub $100.

[–] ProfThadBach@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I am with you.