Asklemmy

I just mean that I can understand where it comes from when someone is already close to their breaking point, and I think most people are about there. They're not consciously deciding to bury their heads, because making a decision requires too much inspection to actually ignore it. Often when I was beaten down it's like my mind selectively blocked out information as a means of protecting me, but I remained in denial about that until I started really getting out of the hole. I'm not sure I'd equate them to Trump supporters in a broader scope, but I do think the lack of inquiry here is not too different from Trump supporters.

I also think that with more animosity towards regular citizens, the more the conversation shifts from the powerful to the powerless. The impact of one citizen changing their mind is wholely insignificant compared to what a politician changing course would do.

I see that there's no apprehension of "Prevention is better than cure". You cannot wave away problems because they're only going to return worse than before.

I'm not smart enough to piece together what you're saying here. Prevention or cure for what? What does prevention look like? Why should we be apprehensive, it sounds like a reasonable statement?

There's also demeaning people who see the atrocities for what they are and want to create awareness so they can minimize it. But are shamed for it.

I do feel this point and I'll admit I've had many infuriating interactions. Now I try to just ignore until I cool down, because once I do it's like this asshole isn't worth that much thought. I have a limited amount of time to be angry, that's better spent on the people who actually could make a meaningful difference by taking a stand.