this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
462 points (99.1% liked)

Games

49007 readers
1867 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mordikan@kbin.earth -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So, that's the thing: what did you pay for? I'm speaking specifically for SWTOR as that's a good case to work from. When you bought it, did you buy the servers and infrastructure behind it or did you buy just access to that service or did you buy a standalone product?

They aren't taking your discs. You bought that, right? They are turning off a computer they have on their end. That's their property, right? If they don't have a right to take your property, do you have a right to take theirs?

Then you get into private servers. Do you have the right to their software that they didn't sell to you?

That's the funny thing about this. If you have the right to take something from them you didn't pay for, do they get the right to take something from you that you did pay for.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you understand the difference between the law as it currently is and wanting to change the law to be something else? Because you're arguing that the law is what it is and everyone else is arguing that the laws should be changed because what currently is is fucking ass.

Currently we don't access to whatever infra software companies run to keep the games working. One of the possible solutions to what SKG wants is that when you buy the game you also essentially get the server software as well so that if the company decides to pull the plug you just go "cool. I'll get my own hardware and run it myself".

And would you defend the same shit when it came to physical goods? Let's say a car came with a software solution that makes the car ring home to make sure you're allowed to turn your car on. Your argument in essence is that this is fine because you own the car and the fact that you can't turn on the car once the car manufacturer shuts down their service is completely fine. Would you be happy with a car that the manufacturer can permanently disable whenever they want? This goes back your previous IP argument as well. The old car model is competing with the new car model so to keep your arguments consistent you should be in favor of having your car be permanently disabled because a new model came out.

In case you want an actual example of something similar, do you think the people who got outraged by BMW introducing a subscription service for heated seats were stupid? After all there are no laws that prevent BMW from doing this so people should just suck it up. Or are you're going to argue people should push back if they think it's a stupid idea. In that case what the fuck do you think we're doing right now?

[–] Mordikan@kbin.earth -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You currently don't have access to infrastructure software because you didn't buy that. You bought a game that uses it.

Given your BMW mention, if you buy a car, do you own the road it operates on? No. Well, maybe that's separate right? BMW doesn't own that road, so what about the factory it was made? Do you own that? No. I do online banking. I own that too. If they shut down for some reason, I should have access to their codebase? No. I have an Amazon account. Do I own AWS infrastructure code? I mean I paid for that, right? No.

It's not that laws can't be changed, nobody made that argument. It's about feasibility. Is it feasible for me and justified for me to own AWS infra because I paid for an Amazon account? No.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In this analogy, can the car you paid for still be driven? Because the problem SKG wants to address is that the games people paid for cannot be played, and I don't think your analogy makes any sense with regards to that.

[–] Mordikan@kbin.earth -1 points 1 day ago

This is regarding MMOs as already stated. Your comment is irrelevant.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You currently don’t have access to infrastructure software because you didn’t buy that. You bought a game that uses it.

Well, depending on the game I do. Some games come with server binaries that let me run my own server and regardless of what the developer or publisher does in the future I can still play those games. And once again, that could be the solution to the SKG movement wants solved. Maybe all games should come with the infrastructure software.

Given your BMW mention, if you buy a car, do you own the road it operates on? No. Well, maybe that’s separate right? BMW doesn’t own that road, so what about the factory it was made? Do you own that? No. I have an Amazon account. Do I own AWS infrastructure code? I mean I paid for that, right? No.

It’s not that laws can’t be changed, nobody made that argument. It’s about feasibility. Is it feasible for me and justified for me to own AWS infra because I paid for an Amazon account? No.

Ookay, I'm not even going to bother trying to decipher whatever the fuck this is. Either try again or don't bother me with this again.

[–] Mordikan@kbin.earth -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm sorry you don't work with analogies. And you chose to post, I didn't request your feelings as input, but whatever.

The first quote still stands. "SOME GamEs i DO!!" is just ignoring the server infrastructure point, so go cry elsewhere.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Analogies should have a point. What point is in your meth-induced analogies? I don't have a problem with analogies, I have a problem that you think I should somehow understand what your brain-broken thought process vomited out.

[–] Mordikan@kbin.earth -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ad hominen attacks are insta-win for the other side. You have no valid argument so you just try to attack the person instead of the idea. That ends the debate. I just won.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

AS far as I'm concerned you have not addressed a single thing I've said (except the some games do, which again you did not explain at all so I don't think that counts either) so my arguments stand as they are. Just because you're incapable of having a real discussion doesn't mean you've won. And the fact that you think there's anything to win shows you're nothing more than a debate pervert. You make up your own rules and then claim you've won so go parade your win and let the adults speak.

[–] Mordikan@kbin.earth -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just because you're incapable of having a real discussion let the adults speak

Is that the best your "brain-broken thought process" could vomit out? Yeah, you lost the argument because you didn't use facts or logic, you just went with having strong feelings about this. In the adult world, people don't care about how this makes you feel. Groups like the EU care about facts. Probably why the SKG just got it's ass handed to it.

PS - Blocking you as you are a dumb cunt (<- Oh look! Ad hominen!)

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Lol. thanks for making my life better.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you bought a game, and they've made it so you cannot play the game that you paid for, they are taking the game from you. This is the whole point of Stop Killing Games.

[–] Mordikan@kbin.earth -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is regarding MMOs as already stated. Your comment is irrelevant.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

Why would that make it irrelevant? MMOs should not become unplayable either. All games should be preserved, regardless of genre.