this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
72 points (90.0% liked)

Asklemmy

54641 readers
568 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

To vote in the poll, upvote or downvote the special comment below.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] pleiades@lemmy.ml 10 points 5 days ago (9 children)

Reading through this thread really makes me wish Esperanto or some other auxiliary language caught on

[โ€“] Katrisia@lemmy.today 2 points 4 days ago (4 children)
[โ€“] pleiades@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

TBH I don't know much about other auxlangs/conlangs besides Esperanto. What makes you prefer Interlingua?

[โ€“] Katrisia@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I prefer Interlingua because it is comprehensible right from the start if you speak a Romance language and I imagine it is sufficiently comprehensible for an English speaker. There's this saying that it is "a language you already know but have never learned". This is done through more natural semantics and syntax.

About this following part, I'm not sure, but I've heard they also call it "the modern Latin". As I understand it, in order to be decipherable to all Romance languages speakers, it employs old Latin roots (with variations). The cool part, in case this is correct, is that we all know some of these words via science, arts, philosophy... (aqua, caelum, ovum...).

[โ€“] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago

This kinda reminds me of Interslavic. It's the same thing, but for slavic languages. As a speaker of one, I truly do understand interslavic without having ever learnt it. I think these things oight to be used more internationally, although I guess English will always rightly have the crown of the lingua franca

[โ€“] pleiades@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Looking at examples online, it is surprisingly easy to understand! I can see it being better than Esperanto for romance language speakers specifically, but it still seems to me like Esperanto would be a better auxiliary language due to the simpler grammar rules and no fixed word order

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)