this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
36 points (78.1% liked)

Asklemmy

54604 readers
425 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Be civil and follow principle of charity in the comments.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] plutopos@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

But zoophilia is not about consent at all!

Scientists use dummy ostriches to collect sperm. Ostriches approach and... use the dummies, by their own volition.

If there was a human in there, it wouldn't be very different from the perspective of the real ostrich. So it'd be technically possible to consensually bottom an ostrich.

But why the fuck would you do it?

This is what people actually despise about bestiality. It's a gut feeling, before any rationalisation

Edit: you could very much argue that the ostrich dummy method is still non-consensual as it involves some form of trickery. But, regardless, I think it's telling that people would treat it differently depending on whether there was a human in it or not, even though from the animal's perspective there is no difference.

[โ€“] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 58 minutes ago

You should see what ranchers do with their cows and horses. More strict bestiality laws are usually defeated at their request, because they artificially inseminate their animals, and jerk off their prized bulls and horses, the semen of which is worth more than gold.

Sick fucks, ranchers are the fucking devil. but that's another story.

[โ€“] when@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

"Animals can't consent" is one of the strongest arguments given against zoophilia. Any conditioned trickery by a human would get considered as sexual misconduct.