this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
131 points (82.3% liked)

Asklemmy

54622 readers
473 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
Cloak@lemmy.ml
mekhos@lemmy.ml
tmpod@lemmy.pt
14specks@lemmy.ml
131
[Ethics] Why do people condemn Zoophilia on the basis of other animal's inability to consent but those same people kill animals without asking for their consent? Why such inconsistency? (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 days ago by when@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
255 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Be civil and follow principle of charity in the comments.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

More humans could survive with more food if we reused the land growing food for animals for growing food for humans to eat.

Animals are raised on grass land, which is different from cropland. Even if all the animals disappeared tomorrow we wouldn't have any extra cropland.

[โ€“] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 1 day ago

That doesn't address grass land vs cropland.

It just complains people are turning forests into cropland.