this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
68 points (98.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

48547 readers
548 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Pretty much every company I've been in or know of values a vertical trajectory instead of a horizontal one for its employees i.e becoming a manager nearly always means a faster salary progression than becoming an expert in one or multiple fields.

Why is expertise valued less?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Because you are mistaking technical skill with people skills.

People who go up manglement chains have people skills. You don't want your middle manglement making decisions that technical people make.

[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 hours ago

"Manglement". I like that. I'm gonna start using that to refer to the incompetent leadership at my workplace.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Ideally you want a balance of both, pure people skills ends with poor technical decisions, pure technical ends with inability to get the other employees on board.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Id rather they leave the technical decisions to the people they literally hire to do technical stuff, not the people they hire to do people stuff.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The direction a company should go in is a technical decision. It has to come from a leader of some kind, and if that leader is non technical or disconnected from the employees, that's how you get poor decisions.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Using MySQL vs mariadb is not a managerial decision. Using Debian over Fedora is not a managerial decision.
Using Service Now over Top desk is a managerial decision.
That is what I mean when talking about technical people making technical decisions

A good manager points the org in a direction and let's those hired for roles do their job in working to that objective.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 5 points 2 hours ago

Agreed, those arent high level manager decisions, but they aren't intern decisions either. They'll be made by a mid level manager or team lead.

The higher up the chain, the less technical and more general the decisions get, but they do still need to have some level of technical understanding, or the direction they point you in could be completely detached from reality.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 4 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Maybe we're misunderstanding each other. I'm not talking about technical people going up the ladder. I'm asking why going up the ladder is valued more than becoming or being an expert on the ground.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 3 points 2 hours ago

Impact and risk.

Farther up the chain your decisions have broader impact, good or bad. Those kinds decisions have more value than decisions that have a much narrower range of effect.

As what my industry calls an SME(subject matter expert), at most my decisions effect one or two systems at a time, while a leadership decision impacts 10 or 100 (or more) people's focus/direction. This includes the risks - so their decisions have a much broader scope.

[–] boob_warbler@fedinsfw.app 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

2 things come to my mind

  1. Social pressure - There's a need to be "seen". Being a technical expert on ground doesn't make you " seen".
  2. Money - The higher you go, the more money you make.
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
  1. Social pressure - There's a need to be "seen". Being a technical expert on ground doesn't make you " seen".

Ah yes, exposure 🤔 So maybe by making technical experts seen, it would normalise increasing their salary.

  1. Money - The higher you go, the more money you make.

I'm questioning why this is the case ;)

[–] boob_warbler@fedinsfw.app 5 points 4 hours ago

Its just too many things packaged and loaded in that question. Haha

If you are a brilliant engineer, you might build an amazing feature. But if you are a director managing 5 teams of 8 engineers, your decisions affect the output of 40 people. Even a small 1% improvement in their efficiency multiplies across the whole group, resulting in massive financial impact.

If a VP makes a strategic mistake, an entire product line gets canceled, and 200 people lose their jobs. Higher pay is often a premium for taking on that personal and financial risk.

On the flip side, traditional corporate structure puts a cap on individual value. They operate like early 20th century assembly line, where a deeply technical engineer is seen no different than a blue collar drone.

As for the "being seen" situation, its not about being seen by your bosses. Its more about being seen by your family and friends. At least in certain cultures, "man of the house" is expected to weild power over others outside their house too. While some are OK being called potty as long as they're paid forty, not everyone subscribes to it.

[–] serpineslair@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Money, power. Most people want to climb said ladder, so suck up to those higher to gain a foothold.