this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
236 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

85570 readers
3753 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Perhaps I didn't remember correctly. I'm curious how movies have gotten away with it

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Movies arent typically made by google.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I don't follow where you are going with this. The premise is Google recording images and having a naked child in them, which is no different than named children appearing in movies without it being CP... Somehow.

And what your response to my comment doesn't seem to address or explain is why those movies got to be allowed when they have naked children in them. At least it's not obvious

So what is it that makes recording naked kids permissible and what doesn't.

Google doesn't make movies doesn't answer or explain anything that I can figure out