this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2026
299 points (100.0% liked)

PC Master Race

21470 readers
601 users here now

A community for PC Master Race.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.
  5. Be thoughtful and helpful: especially when new beginners have questions.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I do continually find it baffling that companies repeatedly replace existing products with something worse

I literally can't think of one time some service or software was retired in lieu of a like for like* replacement and it wasn't actually worse for a very long time.

I'm actually struggling to think of any example actually

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

It's worse for the end user, but better for shareholders.

The best software in many categories is open source and it's astonishing how few people use it. I mainly blame governments in the 1990s and early 00s for embedding Microsoft into their own systems, administrations and most of all: schools. We could be living in a much nicer world right now.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You could maybe make an argument for Counter Strike or Team Fortress or something like that… maybe.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

aren't current iterations of both basically 'live service games' now, with microtransactions driving their continued existence?

they are not the same games as the hl mods i started playing way before steam came along.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

You're describing a fork